Coming apart
Writer Martin Amis once said that to deal with a
cataclysmic event an artist should let at least ten years pass. Hindsight and
introspection will put things in better perspective. Mira Nair seems to have
picked up this dictum as her screen adaptation of Mohsin Hamid’s The Reluctant
Fundamentalist hits the screens eleven years after the towers crumbled on the
fateful day of September 11, 2001.
The two best literary novels on post-9/11 are arguably
Joseph O’Neill’s Netherland and Hamid’s novel that Nair meatily distilled into
a movie with help from the writer himself. The movie opens in present-day
Lahore where an American, an English professor at Lahore University, is
kidnapped by extremist forces and the officials believe Changez Khan (a
charmingly propulsive Riz Ahmed), a professor and alleged sympathiser of the
same forces, might be involved. At the same time, Changez agrees to an
interview with an American journalist Bobby (a functional Liev Schreiber) for
his piece on “militant academia” of Pakistan.
The readers of Hamid’s novel would remember that Changez
talks about his lucrative corporate exploits in New York with a random
stranger, here Schreiber is that stranger. Fresh out of Princeton, Changez
lands up with a plum financial analyst position at Underwood Samson, a
consultancy firm, “the Navy SEALs of finance”. While he is rising under the
tutelage of his bare-knuckled boss Jim (a ruthlessly brilliant Kiefer
Sutherland), Changez feels amazing and looks as if he’s ready to get a
full-length Ayn Rand tattoo on his back.
However, the post-9/11 paranoia results in quite a few
ridiculously humiliating situations for Changez and that triggers a sea change
in his so far reverential attitude towards America. His mostly on-and-off
relationship with Erica ( a somnolent Kate Hudson), who is not fully over her
deceased ex-boyfriend, is not helping him either. Honestly, it’s baffling that
irreparable cracks still appear in relationships these days on the basis of
whether to have a child or not.
There’s not much wrong Nair could do with a source that
is as compelling as Hamid’s novel, where every sentence fizzes with subdued
energy. In fact, some of the liberties that she took with the novel’s plot are
the movie’s weakest links (the climax, the missing out of major events, major
alterations of secondary character’ lives). That said, this is probably her
best film after Monsoon Wedding and Mississippi Masala.
Yes, plot-wise, the movie is steroidal as compared to
the novel’s organic self. But then, the canvas of the movie is bigger than the
novel. Nair needs to be commended for her non-judgmental take on 9/11. She
doesn’t paint either parties in broad strokes. Like Seurat, she carefully
etches out the details. In one of the movie’s many standout scenes, the
confrontation between Schreiber and Riz Ahmed literally crackles the screen up.
Two differing ideologies whose aim is the same never collided better on screen
in the last twelve months.
The all-pervasive Islamophobia that raised its hood
post-9/11 has already been tackled by Nair in a short film for a collection of
movies titled 11’09’’01. So, in a way, The Reluctant Fundamentalist is her
full-length dip into the subject. For starters, her casting is impeccable. Riz
Ahmed tops off this year on a very high note after his incredibly good
performance in Ill Manors. After his previous turn as the gloriously bonkers
Muslim in Four Lions, Ahmed over here carries his pain as a Muslim very ably.
As the wet-behind-the-ears starry-eyed corporate guy he goes overboard but he
is in his elements in the movie’s darker phase.
His near four-minute monologue at Kate Hudson’s
performance art opening night screams “breakout performance” at the highest
decibel-level possible. Of course, there’s the pat inevitability as to how
Changez discovers his ‘true’ identity but even that has been handled
cliché-free by Nair and she owes a huge credit to the intoxicating photography
of Declan Quinn. His camera is very unfussy but nothing could have better
captured the essence of Lahore. Like a gadfly, Quinn’s camera hangs on
Changez’s face for one more moment and that shows his existential despair at
its very best. Shimit Amin’s deft hand at editing too deserves a special
mention.
That brings us to the all-important question: is the
movie better than the book? Speaking at this year’s edition of Jaipur
Literature Festival, the writer Lionel Shriver said that Lynne Ramsay’s film
version of her book We Need To Talk About Kevin is an “elaborate trailer of the
book”. Mira Nair’s largely superb, occasionally muted movie too is a trailer
for Hamid’s terrific book. For its many virtues, it however needs to be
mentioned that Nair tried to cram in too many themes— paranoia to xenophobia to
war philosophy to unnecessary political jokes— which left the secondary
characters barely any breathing space. It’s a testament to Om Puri’s years of
experience as an actor that he still manages to shine through this mini mess.
His takedown of the financial consultancy business is utterly imperious.
By the way, the naysayers should be told not to compare
this with Khuda Kay Liye. The ridiculous discourse and kitschy elements of that
movie render the comparison a levity of juxtaposing exquisite cheese and
rudimentary chalk. Mira Nair has a genuine winner in her hands.
1 Comments:
Still not convinced that it will as good as the book itself. And I must thank Jai Arjun for planting that doubt in my mind, through his post.
I'd love to see the book being adapted as a soliloquy. Something like a 127 Hours, where the protagonist reminisces about the incidents of the past through a flashback. I think that'd make a more powerful film. That is, assuming of course, that Nair wanted to be the film as close (or "true') as possible to the book.
Post a Comment
<< Home